Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Spelt VS Almond paste per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Spelt versus 100 g of Almond paste to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Spelt vs Almond paste:
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have 1.3 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B3 and 2.2 times more Vitamin B6 than Almond paste.
- While 100 g of Almond paste contain 13.8 times more Vitamin B2, 5.6 times more Vitamin B9 and 52.1 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Spelt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Cooked Spelt as well as Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin C in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Spelt vs Almond paste:
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have 1.3 times more Manganese than Almond paste.
- While 100 g of Almond paste contain 17.2 times more Calcium, 2.1 times more Copper, 2.7 times more Magnesium, 1.7 times more Phosphorus and 2.2 times more Potassium than Cooked Spelt.
- Both Cooked Spelt and Almond paste contain similar levels of Iron, Selenium and Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Almond paste contain 3.6 times more Energy, 32.6 times more Fat, 1.8 times more Carbohydrate and 1.6 times more Protein than Cooked Spelt.
- Both Cooked Spelt and Almond paste offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.