Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Broccoli RaabVS Succotash
Weight per 300 calories
Broccoli Raab
1364g
Succotash
303g
Raw Succotash has 4.5 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Broccoli Raab, which is average in comparison to other foods. Broccoli Raab having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Broccoli Raab or Succotash?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Broccoli Raab or Succotash?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Broccoli Raab vs Succotash:
300 calories of Broccoli Raab have 39.3 times more Vitamin A, 3.5 times more Vitamin B1, 7.1 times more Vitamin B2, 3.5 times more Vitamin B3, 11.3 times more Vitamin B5, 5.9 times more Vitamin B6, 9.3 times more Vitamin B9 and 6 times more Vitamin C than Succotash.
300 calories of Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
Both Raw Broccoli Raab as well as Raw Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Broccoli Raab vs Succotash:
300 calories of Broccoli Raab have 27 times more Calcium, 5.3 times more Iron, 2.1 times more Magnesium, 2.6 times more Manganese, 2.9 times more Phosphorus, 2.4 times more Potassium, 7.5 times more Selenium, 37.1 times more Sodium, 5.7 times more Zinc and 5.7 times more Water than Succotash.
Both Broccoli Raab and Succotash contain similar levels of Copper per 300 calories.
300 calories of Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Broccoli Raab have 2.2 times more Fat, 11.2 times more Omega 3, 3.2 times more Fiber and 2.8 times more Protein than Succotash.
While 300 kcal of Raw Succotash contain 3.2 times more Omega 6 and 1.5 times more Carbohydrate than Raw Broccoli Raab.
Both Broccoli Raab and Succotash offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Broccoli Raab provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6