Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Cooked Taro with SaltVS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Weight per 500 calories
Cooked Taro with Salt
352g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
658g
Cooked Taro with Salt has 1.9 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Cooked Taro with Salt or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cooked Taro with Salt
1%
1%
98%
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Cooked Taro With Salt VS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin With Salt Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Cooked Taro with Salt or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt have 1.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.7 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 500 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 367.6 times more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B2, 2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.2 times more Vitamin B5, 4.8 times more Vitamin C and 3.3 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro with Salt.
Both Cooked Taro with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
500 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
Both Cooked Taro with Salt as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Cooked Taro with Salt vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt have 1.3 times more Phosphorus than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 500 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 2.8 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Iron, 2 times more Sodium, 1.4 times more Zinc and 2.3 times more Water than Cooked Taro with Salt.
Both Cooked Taro with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Manganese and Potassium per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Both Cooked Taro with Salt as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 21.9 times more Sugars and 4.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro with Salt.
Both Cooked Taro with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Cooked Taro with Salt as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 500 calories.