Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Commercial Italian Salad DressingVS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
Weight per 300 calories
Commercial Italian Salad Dressing
125g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
34g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 3.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Commercial Italian Salad Dressing, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Commercial Italian Salad Dressing having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Commercial Italian Salad Dressing or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Commercial Italian Salad Dressing VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Commercial Italian Salad Dressing or Composite Household Vegetable Shortening?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 235.7 times more Vitamin B6, 1.3 times more Vitamin E and 3.9 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B6
Both Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12, Vitamin C and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Commercial Italian Salad Dressing vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
300 calories of Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 914.4 times more Sodium than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Commercial Italian Salad Dressing have 2.9 times more Omega 3, 1.3 times more Omega 6, more Carbohydrate and more Sugars than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
While 300 kcal of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 1.3 times more Fat and 2.3 times more Saturated Fat than Commercial Italian Salad Dressing.
Both Commercial Italian Salad Dressing and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate
Both Commercial Italian Salad Dressing as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein in 300 calories.