Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Frozen Succotash with SaltVS Cooked Taro with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
323g
Cooked Taro with Salt
211g
Cooked Taro with Salt has 1.5 times more energy per unit of mass than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt, which is average in comparison to other foods. Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Cooked Taro with Salt?
Cooked Frozen Succotash With Salt VS Cooked Taro With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Cooked Taro with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Cooked Taro with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 3.7 times more Vitamin B2, 3.9 times more Vitamin B3, 2.7 times more Vitamin B9, 1.8 times more Vitamin C and 3.4 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro with Salt contain 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 10.7 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B5 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Cooked Taro with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Cooked Taro with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.9 times more Iron, 1.4 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Sodium, 2.5 times more Zinc and 1.8 times more Water than Cooked Taro with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro with Salt contain 2.2 times more Copper than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt contain similar levels of Magnesium, Manganese and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Cooked Taro with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 7.3 times more Omega 3, 17.2 times more Omega 6, 6.9 times more Sugars, 1.2 times more Fiber and 12.7 times more Protein than Cooked Taro with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein