Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Frozen SuccotashVS Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Frozen Succotash
323g
Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt
236g
Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have 1.4 times more energy per unit of mass than Boiled and Drained Frozen Succotash, which is average in comparison to other foods. Cooked Frozen Succotash having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash or Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt?
Cooked Frozen Succotash VS Frozen Roasted Potatoes With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash or Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash vs Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash have 4.7 times more Vitamin C than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Frozen Succotash vs Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash have 2.4 times more Iron and 1.5 times more Water than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt contain 4.8 times more Sodium than Boiled and Drained Frozen Succotash.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash and Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt contain similar levels of Potassium per 300 calories.
Both Boiled and Drained Frozen Succotash as well as Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash have 4.4 times more Sugars, 2.2 times more Fiber and 2.7 times more Protein than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash and Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.