Cooked Taro no Salt has 1.6 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack, which is average in comparison to other foods. Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack or Cooked Taro?
Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack VS Cooked Taro Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack or Cooked Taro?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack vs Cooked Taro:
300 calories of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack have 155.7 times more Vitamin A, 3.2 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.4 times more Vitamin B9, 8.2 times more Vitamin C and 2.9 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.9 times more Vitamin B1 and 1.9 times more Vitamin E than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack.
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack and Cooked Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack vs Cooked Taro:
300 calories of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack have 1.9 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Manganese, 5.5 times more Sodium and 1.9 times more Water than Cooked Taro.
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack and Cooked Taro contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack as well as Cooked Taro no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack have 15.9 times more Sugars and 5 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.8 times more Fiber than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack.
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack and Cooked Taro offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack as well as Cooked Taro no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.