Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chinese WaterchestnutsVS Stewed Canned Tomatoes
Weight per 300 calories
Chinese Waterchestnuts
309g
Stewed Canned Tomatoes
1154g
Chinese Waterchestnuts have 3.7 times more energy per 100g than Stewed Canned Tomatoes. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Stewed Canned Tomatoes?
Chinese Waterchestnuts VS Stewed Canned Tomatoes Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Stewed Canned Tomatoes?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Stewed Canned Tomatoes:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 1.5 times more Vitamin B2 and 5.2 times more Vitamin B6 than Stewed Canned Tomatoes.
While 300 kcal of Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes contain more Vitamin A, 2.7 times more Vitamin B3, 7.4 times more Vitamin C, 2.6 times more Vitamin E and 29.8 times more Vitamin K than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Stewed Canned Tomatoes provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin K
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Stewed Canned Tomatoes:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 1.5 times more Manganese than Stewed Canned Tomatoes.
While 300 kcal of Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes contain 11.5 times more Calcium, 1.3 times more Copper, 82.7 times more Iron, 2 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Potassium, 3.2 times more Selenium, 58.9 times more Sodium, 1.3 times more Zinc and 4.6 times more Water than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Stewed Canned Tomatoes contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Iron and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 kcal of Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes contain 2.7 times more Sugars and 2.4 times more Protein than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Stewed Canned Tomatoes offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 300 calories.
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Stewed Canned Ripe Red Tomatoes provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.