Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chinese WaterchestnutsVS Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail
Weight per 300 calories
Chinese Waterchestnuts
309g
Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail
1579g
Chinese Waterchestnuts have 5.1 times more energy per 100g than Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail?
Chinese Waterchestnuts VS Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail:
300 kcal of Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail contain more Vitamin A, 1.8 times more Vitamin B1, 3.7 times more Vitamin B3, 2.7 times more Vitamin B5, 6.7 times more Vitamin B9, 69.3 times more Vitamin C, 4.3 times more Vitamin E and 103.8 times more Vitamin K than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin K
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail:
300 kcal of Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail contain 7 times more Calcium, 24.7 times more Iron, 2.8 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Phosphorus, 1.8 times more Potassium, 20.1 times more Sodium and 6.5 times more Water than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail contain similar levels of Copper, Manganese and Zinc per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Iron
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 1.2 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail.
While 300 kcal of Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail contain 6.1 times more Omega 3, 10.4 times more Omega 6, 3 times more Sugars and 3.3 times more Protein than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Canned Low Sodium Vegetable Juice Cocktail offer comparable quantities of Energy and Fiber per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6