Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Chinese WaterchestnutsVS Winged Bean Tuber
Weight per 500 calories
Chinese Waterchestnuts
516g
Winged Bean Tuber
338g
Raw Winged Bean Tuber has 1.5 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts, which is average in comparison to other foods. Chinese Waterchestnuts having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Winged Bean Tuber?
Chinese Waterchestnuts VS Winged Bean Tuber Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Winged Bean Tuber?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Winged Bean Tuber:
500 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 2 times more Vitamin B2, 6.3 times more Vitamin B5, 6.7 times more Vitamin B6, 1.3 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Winged Bean Tuber.
While 500 kcal of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 1.8 times more Vitamin B1 than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Winged Bean Tuber provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 per 500 calories.
500 calories of Winged Bean Tuber have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B5 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Winged Bean Tuber:
500 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 1.4 times more Magnesium, 2.1 times more Phosphorus, 1.5 times more Potassium and 2 times more Water than Winged Bean Tuber.
While 500 kcal of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 1.8 times more Calcium, 2.8 times more Copper, 21.8 times more Iron and 1.8 times more Zinc than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Winged Bean Tuber contain similar levels of Manganese per 500 calories.
500 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Iron
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 1.3 times more Carbohydrate than Winged Bean Tuber.
While 500 kcal of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 5.4 times more Protein than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Winged Bean Tuber offer comparable quantities of Energy per 500 calories.
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 500 calories.