Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Navel Oranges:
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 2.6 times more Vitamin B5, 40.9 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Raw Navel Oranges.
While Raw Navel Oranges contain more Vitamin A, 3.4 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 79 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 g.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Navel Oranges:
Raw Navel Oranges contain 43 times more Calcium, more Copper, 1.9 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium and more Water than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 100 g.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 18 times more Energy, 666.5 times more Fat, 1469.4 times more Saturated Fat, 209.2 times more Omega 3 and 1139.7 times more Omega 6 than Raw Navel Oranges.
While Raw Navel Oranges contain more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Cholesterol, Glucose and Sucrose in 100 g.