Nutrient Comparison: Water Convolvulus VS Succotash per 1 lb
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 1 lb of Water Convolvulus versus 1 lb of Succotash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 1 pound of Water Convolvulus vs Succotash:
- 1 pound of Water Convolvulus has 21 times more Vitamin A, 1.2 times more Vitamin B2, 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 and 3.6 times more Vitamin C than Succotash.
- While 1 lb of Raw Succotash contains 6.9 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B3 and 1.4 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Water Convolvulus .
- Both Water Convolvulus and Succotash provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 per one pound.
- 1 pound of Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
- Both Raw Water Convolvulus as well as Raw Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in one pound.
Comparing minerals per 1 pound for Water Convolvulus vs Succotash:
- 1 pound of Water Convolvulus has 4.3 times more Calcium, 1.5 times more Magnesium, 28.3 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Water than Succotash.
- While 1 lb of Raw Succotash contains 8.1 times more Copper, 4.3 times more Manganese, 2.9 times more Phosphorus and 3.4 times more Zinc than Raw Water Convolvulus .
- Both Water Convolvulus and Succotash contain similar levels of Iron and Potassium per one pound.
- 1 pound of Water Convolvulus lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- 1 pound of Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Water Convolvulus as well as Raw Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in one pound.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 1 pound:
- 1 lb of Raw Succotash contains 5.2 times more Energy, 6.3 times more Carbohydrate, 1.8 times more Fiber and 1.9 times more Protein than Raw Water Convolvulus .
- 1 pound of Water Convolvulus provide inadequate amounts of Energy