Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Frozen Roasted Potatoes with SaltVS Epazote
Weight per 300 calories
Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt
236g
Epazote
938g
Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have 4 times more energy per 100g than Epazote. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Epazote having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt or Epazote?
Frozen Roasted Potatoes With Salt VS Epazote Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt or Epazote?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt vs Epazote:
300 kcal of Raw Epazote contain 8.4 times more Vitamin C than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt vs Epazote:
300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have 1.7 times more Sodium than Epazote.
While 300 kcal of Raw Epazote contain 72.8 times more Calcium, 14.9 times more Iron, 5.6 times more Potassium and 5.2 times more Water than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt have 1.7 times more Protein than Epazote.
While 300 kcal of Raw Epazote contain 5.8 times more Fiber than Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt.
Both Frozen Roasted Potatoes with Salt and Epazote offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Epazote provide inadequate amounts of Protein