Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with SaltVS Broccoli Raab
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
333g
Broccoli Raab
1364g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt has 4.1 times more energy per 100g than Broccoli Raab. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Broccoli Raab having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt or Broccoli Raab?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh With Salt VS Broccoli Raab Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt or Broccoli Raab?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 1.8 times more Vitamin A than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 6.2 times more Vitamin B1, 5 times more Vitamin B2, 3.4 times more Vitamin B3, 1.5 times more Vitamin B5, 2.4 times more Vitamin B6, 56.6 times more Vitamin B9, 4.2 times more Vitamin C, 9.3 times more Vitamin E and 398.4 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt as well as Raw Broccoli Raab have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 1.8 times more Sodium than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 11.6 times more Calcium, 12.7 times more Iron, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 3.3 times more Manganese, 5.5 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Potassium, 20.5 times more Selenium, 9.8 times more Zinc and 5 times more Water than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt and Broccoli Raab contain similar levels of Copper per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have 1.8 times more Carbohydrate and 4.2 times more Sugars than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 13.4 times more Fat, 128.9 times more Omega 3, 3.3 times more Fiber and 6.5 times more Protein than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt and Broccoli Raab offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt as well as Raw Broccoli Raab provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 300 calories.