Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In SkinVS Taro
Weight per 500 calories
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
575g
Taro
446g
Raw Taro has 1.3 times more energy per unit of mass than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt, which is average in comparison to other foods. Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin or Taro?
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin VS Taro Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin or Taro?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin vs Taro:
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have 1.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.1 times more Vitamin B3, 2.2 times more Vitamin B5, 1.4 times more Vitamin B6, 3.7 times more Vitamin C and 2.8 times more Vitamin K than Taro.
While 500 kcal of Raw Taro contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 184.9 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt.
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
500 calories of Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
Both Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt as well as Raw Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin vs Taro:
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have 1.4 times more Copper, 1.7 times more Zinc and 1.4 times more Water than Taro.
While 500 kcal of Raw Taro contain 6.7 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Iron, 2.2 times more Manganese and 1.5 times more Phosphorus than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt.
Both Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin and Taro contain similar levels of Magnesium and Potassium per 500 calories.
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
500 calories of Taro lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt as well as Raw Taro lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have 1.6 times more Protein than Taro.
While 500 kcal of Raw Taro contain 1.8 times more Fiber than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt.
Both Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin and Taro offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 500 calories.
Both Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt as well as Raw Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 500 calories.