Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories EpazoteVS Broccoli Raab
Weight per 300 calories
Epazote
938g
Broccoli Raab
1364g
Epazote has 1.5 times more energy per 100g than Broccoli Raab. It has low energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Broccoli Raab having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Epazote or Broccoli Raab?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Epazote or Broccoli Raab?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Epazote vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Epazote have 1.9 times more Vitamin B2 and 1.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 63.5 times more Vitamin A, 8.4 times more Vitamin B1, 2.8 times more Vitamin B3, 2.6 times more Vitamin B5, 1.6 times more Vitamin B6 and 8.2 times more Vitamin C than Raw Epazote.
300 calories of Epazote have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
Both Raw Epazote as well as Raw Broccoli Raab have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Epazote vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Epazote have 1.8 times more Calcium, 3.1 times more Copper, 3.8 times more Magnesium, 5.4 times more Manganese and 2.2 times more Potassium than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 1.7 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Selenium and 1.5 times more Water than Raw Epazote.
Both Epazote and Broccoli Raab contain similar levels of Phosphorus, Sodium and Zinc per 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Epazote have 1.8 times more Carbohydrate than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 1.4 times more Fat and 14 times more Protein than Raw Epazote.
Both Epazote and Broccoli Raab offer comparable quantities of Energy and Fiber per 300 calories.
300 calories of Epazote provide inadequate amounts of Protein