Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Sweet and Sour Salad DressingVS Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing
Weight per 300 calories
Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing
2000g
Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing
132g
Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing has 15.1 times more energy per unit of mass than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing, which is above average in comparison to other foods. Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing or Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing?
Sweet And Sour Salad Dressing VS Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing or Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing vs Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B3, 15.7 times more Vitamin B5, more Vitamin B6, 15.1 times more Vitamin B9, more Vitamin C, 13.5 times more Vitamin E and 124.9 times more Vitamin K than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9, Vitamin C and Vitamin K
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing as well as Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing vs Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have 5.5 times more Calcium, 15.1 times more Copper, 1.5 times more Iron, 5 times more Magnesium, 12.8 times more Manganese, 3.2 times more Phosphorus, 6.3 times more Potassium, 15.1 times more Selenium, 3.9 times more Sodium and 24.5 times more Water than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
300 calories of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Selenium
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing as well as Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing have 2.1 times more Carbohydrate and 2.2 times more Sugars than Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing contain more Fat, more Saturated Fat, more Omega 3 and more Omega 6 than Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing.
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing and Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6
Both Sweet and Sour Salad Dressing as well as Reduced Calorie French Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein in 300 calories.