Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chinese WaterchestnutsVS Boiled Waxgourd
Weight per 300 calories
Chinese Waterchestnuts
309g
Boiled Waxgourd
2143g
Chinese Waterchestnuts have 6.9 times more energy per 100g than Boiled Waxgourd. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Boiled and Drained Waxgourd having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Boiled Waxgourd?
Chinese Waterchestnuts VS Boiled Waxgourd Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Boiled Waxgourd?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Boiled Waxgourd:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 28.9 times more Vitamin B2, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.2 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Waxgourd.
While 300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Waxgourd contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B1, 2.7 times more Vitamin B3, 1.8 times more Vitamin B5, 1.7 times more Vitamin B9, 18.2 times more Vitamin C and 64.7 times more Vitamin K than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
300 calories of Boiled Waxgourd have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Boiled and Drained Waxgourd have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Boiled Waxgourd:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 2.1 times more Copper and 16.9 times more Potassium than Boiled Waxgourd.
While 300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Waxgourd contain 11.3 times more Calcium, 43.9 times more Iron, 3.1 times more Magnesium, 1.9 times more Phosphorus, 2 times more Selenium, 53 times more Sodium, 8.2 times more Zinc and 9.1 times more Water than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Boiled Waxgourd contain similar levels of Manganese per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Iron and Selenium
300 calories of Boiled Waxgourd lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 kcal of Boiled and Drained Waxgourd contain 19.1 times more Omega 6, 1.7 times more Sugars, 2.3 times more Fiber and 2 times more Protein than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Boiled Waxgourd offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Boiled and Drained Waxgourd provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.