Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked KamutVS 51% whole wheat Pasta
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Kamut
227g
51% whole wheat Pasta
83g
Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina has 2.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Cooked Khorasan Wheat, which is high in comparison to other foods. Cooked Kamut having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Kamut or 51% whole wheat Pasta?
Cooked Kamut VS 51% Whole Wheat Pasta Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Kamut or 51% whole wheat Pasta?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Kamut vs 51% whole wheat Pasta:
300 kcal of Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B2, 1.3 times more Vitamin B3, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 2 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Khorasan Wheat.
300 calories of Cooked Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Kamut vs 51% whole wheat Pasta:
300 calories of Cooked Kamut have 1.3 times more Copper, 1.4 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Phosphorus, 1.2 times more Potassium, 1.3 times more Selenium and 2.1 times more Zinc than 51% whole wheat Pasta.
Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Kamut have 3.2 times more Sugars than 51% whole wheat Pasta.
Both Cooked Kamut and 51% whole wheat Pasta offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein per 300 calories.