Comparing Nutrients in 500 calories TaroVS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
Weight per 500 calories
Taro
446g
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
575g
Taro has 1.3 times more energy per 100g than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Taro or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Taro VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Taro or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Taro vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
500 calories of Taro have 1.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 184.9 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 500 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.1 times more Vitamin B3, 2.2 times more Vitamin B5, 1.4 times more Vitamin B6, 3.7 times more Vitamin C and 2.8 times more Vitamin K than Raw Taro.
500 calories of Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
Both Raw Taro as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Taro vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
500 calories of Taro have 6.7 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Iron, 2.2 times more Manganese, 1.5 times more Phosphorus and 1.2 times more Potassium than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 500 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.4 times more Copper, 1.7 times more Zinc and 1.4 times more Water than Raw Taro.
Both Taro and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Magnesium per 500 calories.
500 calories of Taro lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
500 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Raw Taro as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Taro have 1.8 times more Fiber than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 500 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.6 times more Protein than Raw Taro.
Both Taro and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 500 calories.
Both Raw Taro as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 500 calories.