Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Epazote per 7 oz
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 7 oz of Baked Potato Flesh versus 7 oz of Epazote to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 7 ounces of Baked Potato Flesh vs Epazote:
- 7 ounces of Baked Potato Flesh have 3.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.1 times more Vitamin B5, 2 times more Vitamin B6 and 3.6 times more Vitamin C than Epazote.
- While 7 oz of Raw Epazote contain 16.6 times more Vitamin B2 and 23.9 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 7 ounces of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Epazote have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in seven ounces.
Comparing minerals per 7 ounces for Baked Potato Flesh vs Epazote:
- 7 oz of Raw Epazote contain 55 times more Calcium, 5.4 times more Iron, 4.8 times more Magnesium, 19.2 times more Manganese, 1.7 times more Phosphorus, 1.6 times more Potassium, 8.6 times more Sodium and 3.8 times more Zinc than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Epazote contain similar levels of Copper and Water per seven ounces.
- 7 ounces of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Epazote lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in seven ounces.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 7 ounces:
- 7 ounces of Baked Potato Flesh have 2.9 times more Energy, 2.9 times more Carbohydrate and 5.9 times more Protein than Epazote.
- While 7 oz of Raw Epazote contain 2.5 times more Fiber than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 7 ounces of Epazote provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Protein