Nutrient Comparison: Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Canola Oil per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening versus 100 g of Canola Oil to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Canola Oil:
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have more Vitamin B5 than Canola Oil.
- While 100 g of Canola Oil contain 2.8 times more Vitamin E and 1.3 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Canola Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B5
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canola Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12, Vitamin C and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Canola Oil:
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Canola Oil have similar amounts of minerals per 100 g
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canola Oil lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 3.4 times more Saturated Fat and 1.4 times more Omega 6 than Canola Oil.
- While 100 g of Canola Oil contain 4.9 times more Omega 3 than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Canola Oil offer comparable quantities of Energy and Fat per 100 grams.
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Canola Oil provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein in 100 grams.