Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Corn BranVS Cooked Kamut
Weight per 300 calories
Corn Bran
134g
Cooked Kamut
227g
Corn Bran has 1.7 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Kamut. It has above average energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Khorasan Wheat having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Corn Bran or Cooked Kamut?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Corn Bran or Cooked Kamut?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Corn Bran vs Cooked Kamut:
300 calories of Corn Bran have 2 times more Vitamin B2 and 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 than Cooked Kamut.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain 16.1 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B3 and 4.7 times more Vitamin B9 than Crude Corn Bran.
300 calories of Corn Bran have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B9
300 calories of Cooked Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Crude Corn Bran as well as Cooked Khorasan Wheat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin E in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Corn Bran vs Cooked Kamut:
300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain 1.4 times more Copper, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 12.5 times more Manganese, 3.5 times more Phosphorus, 6.3 times more Potassium, 3.3 times more Selenium and 2 times more Zinc than Crude Corn Bran.
Both Corn Bran and Cooked Kamut contain similar levels of Iron per 300 calories.
300 calories of Corn Bran lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Both Crude Corn Bran as well as Cooked Khorasan Wheat lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Corn Bran have 1.8 times more Carbohydrate and 10.8 times more Fiber than Cooked Kamut.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain more Sugars than Crude Corn Bran.
Both Corn Bran and Cooked Kamut offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 300 calories.