Cooked Taro has 1.6 times more energy per 100g than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Cooked Taro or Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack?
Cooked Taro VS Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack Nutrients Per 500 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 500 calories - Cooked Taro or Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack?
Lets compare vitamin content per 500 calories of Cooked Taro vs Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack:
500 calories of Cooked Taro have 1.9 times more Vitamin B1 and 1.9 times more Vitamin E than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack.
While 500 kcal of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack contain 155.7 times more Vitamin A, 3.2 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.4 times more Vitamin B9, 8.2 times more Vitamin C and 2.9 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro no Salt.
Both Cooked Taro and Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 500 calories.
Comparing minerals per 500 calories for Cooked Taro vs Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack:
500 kcal of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack contain 1.9 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Manganese, 5.5 times more Sodium and 1.9 times more Water than Cooked Taro no Salt.
Both Cooked Taro and Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 500 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 500 calories:
500 calories of Cooked Taro have 1.8 times more Fiber than Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack.
While 500 kcal of Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack contain 15.9 times more Sugars and 5 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
Both Cooked Taro and Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 500 calories.
500 calories of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Canned Sweet Potato, Vacuum Pack provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 500 calories.