Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Raw KamutVS Cooked Quinoa
Weight per 100 calories
Raw Kamut
29.7g
Cooked Quinoa
83.3g
Raw Kamut has 2.8 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Quinoa. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Quinoa having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Raw Kamut or Cooked Quinoa?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Raw Kamut or Cooked Quinoa?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Raw Kamut vs Cooked Quinoa:
100 calories of Raw Kamut have 1.9 times more Vitamin B1 and 5.5 times more Vitamin B3 than Cooked Quinoa.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Quinoa contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B2, 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.9 times more Vitamin E than Uncooked Khorasan Wheat .
100 calories of Raw Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
Both Uncooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Cooked Quinoa have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin C and Vitamin K in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Raw Kamut vs Cooked Quinoa:
100 calories of Raw Kamut have 1.5 times more Manganese, 10.4 times more Selenium and 1.2 times more Zinc than Cooked Quinoa.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Quinoa contain 1.4 times more Magnesium than Uncooked Khorasan Wheat .
Both Raw Kamut and Cooked Quinoa contain similar levels of Copper, Iron, Phosphorus and Potassium per 100 calories.
Both Uncooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Cooked Quinoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Raw Kamut have 3.2 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Fiber than Cooked Quinoa.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Quinoa contain 5 times more Omega 3 and 4.8 times more Omega 6 than Uncooked Khorasan Wheat .
Both Raw Kamut and Cooked Quinoa offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein per 100 calories.
100 calories of Raw Kamut provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6