Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Cooked Frozen Succotash with SaltVS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Weight per 100 calories
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
108g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
132g
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt has 1.2 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
16%
8%
76%
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Cooked Frozen Succotash With Salt VS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin With Salt Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 2 times more Vitamin B3 and 4.5 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 96.3 times more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B5, 2.1 times more Vitamin B6, 2.7 times more Vitamin C and 6.4 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K per 100 calories.
100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin E
100 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.8 times more Phosphorus and 1.8 times more Zinc than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 2.2 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Copper and 1.3 times more Water than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain similar levels of Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Potassium and Sodium per 100 calories.
100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have more Omega 3, 3.7 times more Omega 6, 1.3 times more Fiber and 2.6 times more Protein than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 3.2 times more Sugars than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 100 calories.
100 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6