Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Boiled Sweet Potato no SkinVS Cooked Taro
Weight per 100 calories
Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin
132g
Cooked Taro
70.4g
Cooked Taro no Salt has 1.9 times more energy per unit of mass than Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin, which is average in comparison to other foods. Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin or Cooked Taro?
Boiled Sweet Potato No Skin VS Cooked Taro Nutrients Per 100 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin or Cooked Taro?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin vs Cooked Taro:
100 calories of Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin have 367.6 times more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B2, 2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.2 times more Vitamin B5, 4.8 times more Vitamin C and 3.3 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.7 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin.
Both Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin and Cooked Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 100 calories.
100 calories of Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
100 calories of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
Both Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin vs Cooked Taro:
100 calories of Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin have 2.8 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Iron, 3.4 times more Sodium, 1.4 times more Zinc and 2.3 times more Water than Cooked Taro.
While 100 kcal of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.3 times more Phosphorus than Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin.
Both Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin and Cooked Taro contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Manganese and Potassium per 100 calories.
100 calories of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Both Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin have 21.9 times more Sugars and 4.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
Both Boiled Sweet Potato no Skin and Cooked Taro offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 100 calories.
100 calories of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Boiled Sweet Potato without Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 calories.