Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Potato SkinVS Bulb Fennel
Weight per 100 calories
Potato Skin
172g
Bulb Fennel
323g
Potato Skin has 1.9 times more energy per 100g than Bulb Fennel. It has low energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Bulb Fennel having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Potato Skin or Bulb Fennel?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Potato Skin or Bulb Fennel?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Potato Skin vs Bulb Fennel:
100 calories of Potato Skin have 2.7 times more Vitamin B6 than Bulb Fennel.
While 100 kcal of Raw Bulb Fennel contain more Vitamin A, 1.6 times more Vitamin B2, 1.4 times more Vitamin B5, 3 times more Vitamin B9 and 2 times more Vitamin C than Raw Potato Skin.
Both Potato Skin and Bulb Fennel provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B3 per 100 calories.
100 calories of Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Raw Bulb Fennel have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Potato Skin vs Bulb Fennel:
100 calories of Potato Skin have 3.4 times more Copper, 2.4 times more Iron and 1.7 times more Manganese than Bulb Fennel.
While 100 kcal of Raw Bulb Fennel contain 3.1 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Magnesium, 2.5 times more Phosphorus, 1.9 times more Potassium, 4.4 times more Selenium, 9.7 times more Sodium and 2 times more Water than Raw Potato Skin.
Both Potato Skin and Bulb Fennel contain similar levels of Zinc per 100 calories.
100 calories of Potato Skin lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 kcal of Raw Bulb Fennel contain 9.9 times more Omega 6 and 2.3 times more Fiber than Raw Potato Skin.
Both Potato Skin and Bulb Fennel offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein per 100 calories.
100 calories of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Raw Bulb Fennel provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 100 calories.