Comparing Nutrients in 100 calories Cooked KamutVS Corn Bran
Weight per 100 calories
Cooked Kamut
75.8g
Corn Bran
44.6g
Crude Corn Bran has 1.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Cooked Khorasan Wheat, which is above average in comparison to other foods. Cooked Kamut having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Cooked Kamut or Corn Bran?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 100 calories - Cooked Kamut or Corn Bran?
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 calories of Cooked Kamut vs Corn Bran:
100 calories of Cooked Kamut have 16.1 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B3 and 4.7 times more Vitamin B9 than Corn Bran.
While 100 kcal of Crude Corn Bran contain 2 times more Vitamin B2 and 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 than Cooked Khorasan Wheat.
100 calories of Cooked Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
100 calories of Corn Bran have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B9
Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Crude Corn Bran have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin E in 100 calories.
Comparing minerals per 100 calories for Cooked Kamut vs Corn Bran:
100 calories of Cooked Kamut have 1.4 times more Copper, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 12.5 times more Manganese, 3.5 times more Phosphorus, 6.3 times more Potassium, 3.3 times more Selenium and 2 times more Zinc than Corn Bran.
Both Cooked Kamut and Corn Bran contain similar levels of Iron per 100 calories.
100 calories of Corn Bran lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Crude Corn Bran lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 calories:
100 calories of Cooked Kamut have more Sugars than Corn Bran.
While 100 kcal of Crude Corn Bran contain 1.8 times more Carbohydrate and 10.8 times more Fiber than Cooked Khorasan Wheat.
Both Cooked Kamut and Corn Bran offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 100 calories.