Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories MilletVS Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Millet
79.4g
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
206g
Millet has 2.6 times more energy per 100g than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Millet or Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Millet
12%
10%
78%
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Millet VS Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Millet or Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Millet vs Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt:
300 calories of Millet have 1.5 times more Vitamin B1 and 3 times more Vitamin B2 than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Raw Millet.
Both Millet and Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 and Vitamin B9 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Millet have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Raw Millet as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Millet vs Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt:
300 calories of Millet have 3.8 times more Copper, 1.9 times more Iron, 2.1 times more Magnesium, 4 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.9 times more Zinc than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain 5 times more Potassium and 180.7 times more Sodium than Raw Millet.
300 calories of Millet lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Both Raw Millet as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Millet have 3.1 times more Omega 6, 1.6 times more Fiber and 1.8 times more Protein than Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt contain 3.1 times more Fat and 4.5 times more Saturated Fat than Raw Millet.
Both Millet and Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Raw Millet as well as Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.