Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Raw QuinoaVS Cooked Oat Bran
Weight per 300 calories
Raw Quinoa
81.5g
Cooked Oat Bran
750g
Raw Quinoa has 9.2 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Oat Bran. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Oat Bran having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Raw Quinoa or Cooked Oat Bran?
Raw Quinoa VS Cooked Oat Bran Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Raw Quinoa or Cooked Oat Bran?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Raw Quinoa vs Cooked Oat Bran:
300 calories of Raw Quinoa have 2.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 3.3 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Oat Bran.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Oat Bran contain 4.1 times more Vitamin B1 and 2.6 times more Vitamin B5 than Raw Quinoa.
Both Raw Quinoa and Cooked Oat Bran provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B3 per 300 calories.
Both Raw Quinoa as well as Cooked Oat Bran have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Raw Quinoa vs Cooked Oat Bran:
300 kcal of Cooked Oat Bran contain 2 times more Calcium, 1.8 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 4.4 times more Manganese, 2.4 times more Phosphorus, 1.5 times more Potassium, 8.3 times more Selenium, 1.6 times more Zinc and 58.2 times more Water than Raw Quinoa.
Both Raw Quinoa and Cooked Oat Bran contain similar levels of Copper per 300 calories.
300 calories of Raw Quinoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Raw Quinoa have 1.9 times more Omega 3 than Cooked Oat Bran.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Oat Bran contain 1.3 times more Fat, 1.6 times more Carbohydrate, 3.4 times more Fiber and 2.1 times more Protein than Raw Quinoa.
Both Raw Quinoa and Cooked Oat Bran offer comparable quantities of Energy and Omega 6 per 300 calories.