Nutrient Comparison: George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins VS Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins versus 100 g of Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins vs Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough:
- Both George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins and Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough have similar amounts of vitamins per 100 g
- Both George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins as well as Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins vs Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough:
- 100 grams of George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins have 6.4 times more Calcium than Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough.
- While 100 g of Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough contain 1.4 times more Iron and 2.3 times more Sodium than George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins have 1.8 times more Protein than Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough.
- While 100 g of Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough contain 1.4 times more Energy, 6.3 times more Fat and 10.6 times more Saturated Fat than George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins.
- Both George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins and Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough offer comparable quantities of Carbohydrate per 100 grams.