Nutrient Comparison: Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina VS Whole Soft Wheat Flour per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina versus 100 g of Whole Soft Wheat Flour to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina vs Whole Soft Wheat Flour:
- 100 grams of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina have 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Whole Soft Wheat Flour.
- While 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.9 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.9 times more Vitamin B6 than Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Enriched Semolina.
- Both Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Enriched Semolina as well as Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina vs Whole Soft Wheat Flour:
- 100 grams of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina have 2.4 times more Selenium than Whole Soft Wheat Flour.
- While 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 3 times more Calcium, 2.6 times more Copper, 2.3 times more Iron, 2.9 times more Magnesium, 3.4 times more Manganese, 3.3 times more Phosphorus, 5.5 times more Potassium and 2.9 times more Zinc than Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Enriched Semolina.
- 100 grams of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta with Enriched Semolina lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 2.1 times more Energy, 1.3 times more Fat, 2.4 times more Carbohydrate, 2.9 times more Fiber and 1.7 times more Protein than Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Enriched Semolina.