Nutrient Comparison: Crackers, toast thins, low sodium VS Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium versus 100 g of Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium vs Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped:
- 100 grams of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium have 3.6 times more Vitamin B6 than Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped.
- While 100 g of Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped contain 2.2 times more Vitamin B1, 4 times more Vitamin B2, 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 4.6 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.2 times more Vitamin E than Crackers, toast thins, low sodium.
- Both Crackers, toast thins, low sodium and Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped provide similar amounts of Vitamin K per 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Crackers, toast thins, low sodium vs Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped:
- 100 grams of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium have 2.3 times more Copper, 4.1 times more Magnesium, 1.6 times more Phosphorus, 1.4 times more Potassium, 11.5 times more Selenium and 1.8 times more Zinc than Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped.
- While 100 g of Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped contain more Calcium, 1.3 times more Iron and 5.5 times more Sodium than Crackers, toast thins, low sodium.
- 100 grams of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Crackers, toast thins, low sodium have 1.6 times more Saturated Fat, 2.3 times more Omega 3, 2.2 times more Omega 6, 10.9 times more Sugars and 3.1 times more Fiber than Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped.
- While 100 g of Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped contain 1.6 times more Protein than Crackers, toast thins, low sodium.
- Both Crackers, toast thins, low sodium and Crackers, flavored, fish-shaped offer comparable quantities of Energy, Fat and Carbohydrate per 100 grams.