Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Quinoa VS 51% whole wheat Pasta per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Quinoa versus 100 g of 51% whole wheat Pasta to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa vs 51% whole wheat Pasta:
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have 3.7 times more Vitamin E than 51% whole wheat Pasta.
- While 100 g of Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina contain 3.5 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B2, 19.3 times more Vitamin B3, 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Quinoa.
- 100 grams of 51% whole wheat Pasta have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Cooked Quinoa as well as Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Quinoa vs 51% whole wheat Pasta:
- 100 g of Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina contain 1.6 times more Calcium, 2.2 times more Copper, 2.2 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Magnesium, 3.6 times more Manganese, 1.9 times more Phosphorus, 2.1 times more Potassium, 24.8 times more Selenium and 2.2 times more Zinc than Cooked Quinoa.
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have 1.4 times more Omega 3 than 51% whole wheat Pasta.
- While 100 g of Dry 51% whole wheat Pasta with Unenriched Semolina contain 3 times more Energy, 1.4 times more Fat, 3.4 times more Carbohydrate, 3 times more Sugars, 3.6 times more Fiber and 3.1 times more Protein than Cooked Quinoa.
- Both Cooked Quinoa and 51% whole wheat Pasta offer comparable quantities of Omega 6 per 100 grams.