Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Kamut VS Cooked Quinoa per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Kamut versus 100 g of Cooked Quinoa to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Kamut vs Cooked Quinoa:
- 100 grams of Cooked Kamut have 5.6 times more Vitamin B3 than Cooked Quinoa.
- While 100 g of Cooked Quinoa contain 3.7 times more Vitamin B2, 1.8 times more Vitamin B6, 3.8 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.6 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Khorasan Wheat.
- Both Cooked Kamut and Cooked Quinoa provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Cooked Quinoa have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Kamut vs Cooked Quinoa:
- 100 grams of Cooked Kamut have 1.6 times more Manganese, 11.4 times more Selenium and 1.7 times more Zinc than Cooked Quinoa.
- While 100 g of Cooked Quinoa contain 1.3 times more Magnesium than Cooked Khorasan Wheat.
- Both Cooked Kamut and Cooked Quinoa contain similar levels of Copper, Iron, Phosphorus and Potassium per 100 grams.
- Both Cooked Khorasan Wheat as well as Cooked Quinoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Kamut have 1.3 times more Carbohydrate, 3.5 times more Sugars, 1.5 times more Fiber and 1.3 times more Protein than Cooked Quinoa.
- Both Cooked Kamut and Cooked Quinoa offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 grams.