Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Napa Cabbage VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Napa Cabbage versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage have 4.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 21 times more Vitamin B1, 3 times more Vitamin B3, 15.9 times more Vitamin B5, 8.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 4 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B5
- Both Cooked Napa Cabbage as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Napa Cabbage vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage have 5.8 times more Calcium, 2.1 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Manganese and 1.3 times more Water than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 2.2 times more Copper, 3.1 times more Magnesium, 2.6 times more Phosphorus, 4.5 times more Potassium and 2.1 times more Zinc than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Zinc
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Cooked Napa Cabbage as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 7.8 times more Energy, 9.7 times more Carbohydrate and 1.8 times more Protein than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein