Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Cooked Napa Cabbage per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Cooked Napa Cabbage to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Cooked Napa Cabbage:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 21 times more Vitamin B1, 3 times more Vitamin B3, 15.9 times more Vitamin B5, 8.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 4 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- While 100 g of Cooked Napa Cabbage contain 4.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B5
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Cooked Napa Cabbage have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Cooked Napa Cabbage:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 2.2 times more Copper, 3.1 times more Magnesium, 2.6 times more Phosphorus, 4.5 times more Potassium and 2.1 times more Zinc than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- While 100 g of Cooked Napa Cabbage contain 5.8 times more Calcium, 2.1 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Manganese and 1.3 times more Water than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Zinc
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Cooked Napa Cabbage lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 7.8 times more Energy, 9.7 times more Carbohydrate and 1.8 times more Protein than Cooked Napa Cabbage.
- 100 grams of Cooked Napa Cabbage provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein