Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTSVS Tart, breakfast, low fat
Weight per 300 calories
Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS
64.5g
Tart, breakfast, low fat
80.6g
Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS have 1.3 times more energy per 100g than Tart, breakfast, low fat. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Tart, breakfast, low fat having high energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS or Tart, breakfast, low fat?
Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS VS Tart, Breakfast, Low Fat Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS or Tart, breakfast, low fat?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS vs Tart, breakfast, low fat:
Both Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS and Tart, breakfast, low fat have similar amounts of vitamins per 300 kcal
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS vs Tart, breakfast, low fat:
300 kcal of Tart, breakfast, low fat contain 1.3 times more Sodium than Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS have 2.2 times more Fat, 1.8 times more Saturated Fat, 1.9 times more Omega 6, 4.4 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Protein than Tart, breakfast, low fat.
While 300 kcal of Tart, breakfast, low fat contain 1.3 times more Carbohydrate than Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS.
Both Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS and Tart, breakfast, low fat offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Tart, breakfast, low fat provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 and Protein
Both Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS as well as Tart, breakfast, low fat provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.