Nutrient Comparison: Arugula VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Arugula versus 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Arugula vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Arugula have more Vitamin A, 4.3 times more Vitamin B2, 9.7 times more Vitamin B9, 43 times more Vitamin E and 49.4 times more Vitamin K than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.4 times more Vitamin B1, 4.7 times more Vitamin B3 and 4.1 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Arugula have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Arugula vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 32 times more Calcium, 4.7 times more Iron, 2.1 times more Magnesium, 2.3 times more Manganese and 1.6 times more Zinc than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.5 times more Copper than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Phosphorus, Potassium and Water per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 17 times more Omega 3, 2.3 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Protein than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 3.5 times more Energy and 5.5 times more Carbohydrate than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Arugula provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.