Nutrient Comparison: Arugula VS Potato Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Arugula versus 100 g of Potato Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Arugula vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Arugula have more Vitamin A, 2.1 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B2, 1.4 times more Vitamin B5, 5.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.3 times more Vitamin C than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 3.4 times more Vitamin B3 and 3.3 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Arugula.
- 100 grams of Arugula have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3
- 100 grams of Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B1
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Raw Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Arugula vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 5.3 times more Calcium, 2 times more Magnesium, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.3 times more Zinc than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 5.6 times more Copper, 2.2 times more Iron and 1.9 times more Manganese than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Potato Skin contain similar levels of Potassium and Water per 100 grams.
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Raw Potato Skin lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 17 times more Omega 3 than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 2.3 times more Energy, 3.4 times more Carbohydrate and 1.6 times more Fiber than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Potato Skin offer comparable quantities of Protein per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Arugula provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- 100 grams of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Raw Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.