Nutrient Comparison: Arugula VS Tomato Paste per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Arugula versus 100 g of Tomato Paste to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Arugula vs Tomato Paste:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 1.6 times more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B5, 8.1 times more Vitamin B9 and 9.5 times more Vitamin K than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B2, 10.1 times more Vitamin B3, 3 times more Vitamin B6, 1.5 times more Vitamin C and 10 times more Vitamin E than Raw Arugula.
- 100 grams of Arugula have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Canned Tomato Paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Arugula vs Tomato Paste:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 4.4 times more Calcium and 1.2 times more Water than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 4.8 times more Copper, 2 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Phosphorus, 2.7 times more Potassium, 17.7 times more Selenium, 2.2 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Raw Arugula.
- Both Arugula and Tomato Paste contain similar levels of Magnesium and Manganese per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Arugula lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Arugula have 24.3 times more Omega 3 than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 3.3 times more Energy, 5.2 times more Carbohydrate, 5.9 times more Sugars, 2.6 times more Fiber and 1.7 times more Protein than Raw Arugula.
- 100 grams of Arugula provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- 100 grams of Tomato Paste provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3
- Both Raw Arugula as well as Canned Tomato Paste provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.