Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Broccoli Raab VS Watercress per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Broccoli Raab versus 100 g of Watercress to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Broccoli Raab vs Watercress:
- 100 grams of Cooked Broccoli Raab have 1.4 times more Vitamin A, 1.9 times more Vitamin B1, 10.1 times more Vitamin B3, 1.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.7 times more Vitamin B6, 7.9 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.5 times more Vitamin E than Watercress.
- Both Cooked Broccoli Raab and Watercress provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2, Vitamin C and Vitamin K per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Watercress have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3
- Both Cooked Broccoli Raab as well as Raw Watercress have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Broccoli Raab vs Watercress:
- 100 grams of Cooked Broccoli Raab have 6.4 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 1.6 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Phosphorus, 1.4 times more Selenium, 1.4 times more Sodium and 4.9 times more Zinc than Watercress.
- Both Cooked Broccoli Raab and Watercress contain similar levels of Calcium, Copper, Potassium and Water per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Watercress lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Broccoli Raab have 8.7 times more Omega 3, 2.4 times more Carbohydrate, 5.6 times more Fiber and 1.7 times more Protein than Watercress.
- 100 grams of Watercress provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Carbohydrate and Fiber
- Both Cooked Broccoli Raab as well as Raw Watercress provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6 in 100 grams.