Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Beet Greens per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Beet Greens to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Beet Greens:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 2.1 times more Vitamin B3 and 1.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Beet Greens.
- While 100 g of Raw Beet Greens contain 316 times more Vitamin A, 4.6 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin C, 7.9 times more Vitamin E and 210.5 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Beet Greens provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Beet Greens have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Beet Greens:
- 100 g of Raw Beet Greens contain 7.3 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Copper, 9.5 times more Iron, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium, 16.1 times more Sodium and 1.5 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Beet Greens contain similar levels of Manganese and Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Beet Greens lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 7.3 times more Energy, 8.8 times more Carbohydrate and 3.4 times more Sugars than Beet Greens.
- While 100 g of Raw Beet Greens contain 2.1 times more Fiber and 1.6 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Beet Greens provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Beet Greens provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.