Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Winged Bean Tuber per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Winged Bean Tuber to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Winged Bean Tuber:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Winged Bean Tuber.
- While 100 g of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 4.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.1 times more Vitamin B2 and 1.9 times more Vitamin B3 than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Winged Bean Tuber provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Winged Bean Tuber:
- 100 g of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 1.9 times more Calcium, 13.9 times more Copper, 7.4 times more Iron, 1.4 times more Manganese, 1.7 times more Phosphorus, 2.2 times more Potassium, 2.5 times more Sodium and 4.1 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Winged Bean Tuber contain similar levels of Magnesium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.4 times more Carbohydrate than Winged Bean Tuber.
- While 100 g of Raw Winged Bean Tuber contain 8.5 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Winged Bean Tuber offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 grams.
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Winged Bean Tuber provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.