Nutrient Comparison: White Sweet Corn VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of White Sweet Corn versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of White Sweet Corn vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of White Sweet Corn have 1.9 times more Vitamin B1, 2.9 times more Vitamin B2, 1.2 times more Vitamin B3, 1.4 times more Vitamin B5 and 5.1 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 5.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 1.9 times more Vitamin C than Raw White Sweet Corn.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Raw White Sweet Corn as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for White Sweet Corn vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of White Sweet Corn have 1.5 times more Iron, 1.5 times more Magnesium, 1.8 times more Phosphorus and 1.6 times more Zinc than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 4 times more Copper and 1.4 times more Potassium than Raw White Sweet Corn.
- Both White Sweet Corn and Baked Potato Flesh contain similar levels of Manganese and Water per 100 grams.
- Both Raw White Sweet Corn as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of White Sweet Corn have 16.9 times more Omega 6, 1.9 times more Sugars, 1.8 times more Fiber and 1.6 times more Protein than Baked Potato Flesh.
- Both White Sweet Corn and Baked Potato Flesh offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
- Both Raw White Sweet Corn as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 100 grams.