Nutrient Comparison: Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies VS Butternut Winter Squash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies versus 100 g of Butternut Winter Squash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies vs Butternut Winter Squash:
- 100 g of Raw Butternut Winter Squash contain 26.6 times more Vitamin A, 2.9 times more Vitamin B1, 1.9 times more Vitamin B3, 2.7 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6, 3 times more Vitamin B9 and 3.4 times more Vitamin C than Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- Both Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies as well as Raw Butternut Winter Squash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies vs Butternut Winter Squash:
- 100 grams of Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies have 1.3 times more Copper and 100.3 times more Sodium than Butternut Winter Squash.
- While 100 g of Raw Butternut Winter Squash contain 2.4 times more Calcium, 2.7 times more Iron, 3.1 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Manganese, 2.4 times more Phosphorus and 3.3 times more Potassium than Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- Both Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies and Butternut Winter Squash contain similar levels of Water per 100 grams.
- Both Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies as well as Raw Butternut Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Butternut Winter Squash contain 3.2 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- Both Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies as well as Raw Butternut Winter Squash provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein in 100 grams.