Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories OrangesVS Purslane
Weight per 300 calories
Oranges
638g
Purslane
1500g
Oranges have 2.4 times more energy per 100g than Purslane. It has low energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Purslane having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Oranges or Purslane?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Oranges or Purslane?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Oranges vs Purslane:
300 calories of Oranges have 3 times more Vitamin B5 than Purslane.
While 300 kcal of Raw Purslane contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B1, 6.6 times more Vitamin B2, 4 times more Vitamin B3 and 2.9 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Oranges.
Both Oranges and Purslane provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C per 300 calories.
Both Raw Oranges as well as Raw Purslane have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Oranges vs Purslane:
300 kcal of Raw Purslane contain 3.8 times more Calcium, 5.9 times more Copper, 46.8 times more Iron, 16 times more Magnesium, 28.5 times more Manganese, 7.4 times more Phosphorus, 6.4 times more Potassium, 4.2 times more Selenium, more Sodium, 5.7 times more Zinc and 2.5 times more Water than Raw Oranges.
300 calories of Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Oranges have 1.5 times more Carbohydrate than Purslane.
While 300 kcal of Raw Purslane contain 59.1 times more Omega 3, 14.1 times more Omega 6 and 5.1 times more Protein than Raw Oranges.
Both Oranges and Purslane offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Oranges provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6