Nutrient Comparison: Canned Butterbur VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Butterbur versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Butterbur vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 17.5 times more Vitamin B1, 10 times more Vitamin B3, 50.5 times more Vitamin B5, 9.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 3 times more Vitamin B9 than Canned Butterbur.
- Both Canned Butterbur and Baked Potato Flesh provide similar amounts of Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9
- Both Canned Butterbur as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Butterbur vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have 6.8 times more Calcium, 1.8 times more Iron and 1.3 times more Water than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 5.8 times more Copper, 12.5 times more Magnesium, 1.6 times more Manganese, 12.5 times more Phosphorus, 32.6 times more Potassium and 4.8 times more Zinc than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Canned Butterbur as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 31 times more Energy, 56.7 times more Carbohydrate and 17.8 times more Protein than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein