Nutrient Comparison: Edible Podded Peas VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Edible Podded Peas versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Edible Podded Peas vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Edible Podded Peas have 54 times more Vitamin A, 1.7 times more Vitamin B1, 1.7 times more Vitamin B2, 7 times more Vitamin B5, 1.8 times more Vitamin B6, 1.6 times more Vitamin B9, 2.9 times more Vitamin C, 2.1 times more Vitamin E and 13.2 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B3 than Raw Edible Podded Peas.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Raw Edible Podded Peas as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Edible Podded Peas vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Edible Podded Peas have 2.7 times more Calcium, 7.7 times more Iron, 2 times more Phosphorus and 1.5 times more Water than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.3 times more Copper, 1.6 times more Manganese, 1.4 times more Potassium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Raw Edible Podded Peas.
- Both Edible Podded Peas and Cassava contain similar levels of Magnesium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Edible Podded Peas as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Edible Podded Peas have 2.4 times more Sugars, 1.4 times more Fiber and 2.1 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 3.8 times more Energy and 5 times more Carbohydrate than Raw Edible Podded Peas.
- 100 grams of Edible Podded Peas provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- Both Raw Edible Podded Peas as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.